International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer and Communication Engineering
ISSN Approved Journal | Impact factor: 8.771 | ESTD: 2013 | Follows UGC CARE Journal Norms and Guidelines
| Monthly, Peer-Reviewed, Refereed, Scholarly, Multidisciplinary and Open Access Journal | High Impact Factor 8.771 (Calculated by Google Scholar and Semantic Scholar | AI-Powered Research Tool | Indexing in all Major Database & Metadata, Citation Generator | Digital Object Identifier (DOI) |
| TITLE | Data Balancing and CNN Based Intrusion Detection System |
|---|---|
| ABSTRACT | The help of an automated process that filters and classifies network intrusions is often needed by cyber-security professionals. The classification of the attack type is essential for applying specific preventive measures to secure networks. Numerous Machine Learning (ML) models have been proposed as the foundation for Network Intrusion Detection (NID) systems. Yet, their efficacy varies based on many factors. For instance, an ML model trained on a highly unbalanced dataset may be biased towards over-represented attack types. On the other hand, focusing solely on the ML model's performance in minority classes can have a negative impact on its performance in the majority classes. We proposes a Network Intrusion Detection (NID) system that addresses the issue of imbalanced datasets and uses Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) to classify different attack types. The performance of the proposed system is compared to other systems that use different techniques such as Random Over-Sampling (ROS), Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE), Adaptive Synthetic Sampling (ADASYN), and Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN) for data balancing.The NSL-KDD and BoT-IoT datasets are used for benchmarking, and the results show that the proposed system performs well in the minority classes on the binary classification task. Our proposed system scores a good weighted average F1-Score on the multi-class classification task using the BoT-IoT dataset. |
| AUTHOR | R.SIVA LAKSHMI, K. RAJESWARI Student, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Andhra Loyola Institute of Engineering and Technology, ITI Road, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, India Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Andhra Loyola Institute of Engineering and Technology, ITI Road, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, India |
| VOLUME | 183 |
| DOI | DOI: 10.15680/IJIRCCE.2026.1404069 |
| pdf/69_Data Balancing and CNN Based Intrusion Detection System.pdf | |
| KEYWORDS | |
| References | [1] Y. Yang, K. Zheng, et al., “Improving the classification effectiveness of intrusion detection by using improved conditional variational autoencoder and deep neural network,” Sensors, vol. 19, no. 11, 2019. [2] A. Fatani, M. Abd Elaziz, et al., “Iot intrusion detection system using deep learning and enhanced transient search optimization,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 123448–123464, 2021. [3] N. Gupta, V. Jindal, and P. Bedi, “Lio-ids: Handling class imbalance using lstm and improved one-vs-one technique in intrusion detection system,” Computer Networks, vol. 192, p. 108076, 2021. [4] K. Jiang, W. Wang, A. Wang, and H. Wu, “Network intrusion detection combined hybrid sampling with deep hierarchical network,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 32464–32476, 2020. [5] R. Chapaneri and S. Shah, “Enhanced detection of imbalanced malicious network traffic with regularized generative adversarial networks,” Journal of Network and Computer Applications, vol. 202, p. 103368, 2022. [6] H. Ding et al., “Imbalanced data classification: A knn and generative adversarial networks-based hybrid approach for intrusion detection,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 131, pp. 240–254, 2022. [7] X. Zhang, J. Ran, and J. Mi, “An intrusion detection system based on convolutional neural network for imbalanced network traffic,” in IEEE 7th International Conference on Computer Science and Network Tech. (ICCSNT), pp. 456–460, 2019. [8] J. Liu, Y. Gao, and F. Hu, “A fast network intrusion detection system using adaptive synthetic oversampling and lightgbm,” Computers & Security, vol. 106, p. 102289, 2021. [9] B. A. Tama and K. H. Rhee, “An in-depth experimental study of anomaly detection using gradient boosted machine,” Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 31, pp. 955–965, 2017. [10] Y. Yang, K. Zheng, B. Wu, Y. Yang, and X. Wang, “Network intrusion detection based on supervised adversarial variational auto-encoder with regularization,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 42169–42184, 2020. [11] M. Tavallaee et al., “A detailed analysis of the kdd cup 99 data set,” in 2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence for Security and Defense Applications, pp. 1–6, 2009. [12] N. Koroniotis, N. Moustafa, et al., “Towards the development of realistic botnet dataset in the internet of things for network forensic analytics: Bot-iot dataset,” CoRR, vol. abs/1811.00701, 2018. [13] A. Divekar et al., “Benchmarking datasets for anomaly-based network intrusion detection: Kdd cup 99 alternatives,” in IEEE 3rd Int. Conf. on Computing, Communication and Security (ICCCS), pp. 1–8, 2018. [14] S. Huang and K. Lei, “Igan-ids: An imbalanced generative adversarial network towards intrusion detection system in ad-hoc networks,” Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 105, p. 102177, 2020. [15] O. Elghalhoud, K. Naik, et al., “Data balancing and hyper-parameter optimization for machine learning algorithms for secure iot networks,” In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Symposium on QoS and Security for Wireless and Mobile Networks (Q2SWinet ’22), 2022. [16] Z. Li, Qin, et al., “Intrusion detection using convolutional neural networks for representation learning,” in Neural Information Processing, (Cham), pp. 858–866, Springer International Publishing, 2017. [17] B. A. Tama, M. Comuzzi, and K.-H. Rhee, “Tse-ids: A two-stage classifier ensemble for intelligent anomaly-based intrusion detection system,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 94497–94507, 2019. |
