International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer and Communication Engineering
ISSN Approved Journal | Impact factor: 8.771 | ESTD: 2013 | Follows UGC CARE Journal Norms and Guidelines
| Monthly, Peer-Reviewed, Refereed, Scholarly, Multidisciplinary and Open Access Journal | High Impact Factor 8.771 (Calculated by Google Scholar and Semantic Scholar | AI-Powered Research Tool | Indexing in all Major Database & Metadata, Citation Generator | Digital Object Identifier (DOI) |
| TITLE | ProTask AI: GenAI Integrated Task Manager |
|---|---|
| ABSTRACT | ProTask AI: GenAI Integrated Task Manager is an intelligent task management system that combines generative AI, natural language processing, and artificial intelligence (AI) technologies to increase productivity. By enabling users to create, amend, and manage tasks using natural conversational inputs rather than tedious form-based interactions, the system gets beyond the drawbacks of conventional task managers. Through the Ollama framework, it makes use of a locally deployed Large Language Model (LLM), guaranteeing data privacy, lower latency, and real-time processing without depending on outside cloud services. The main feature is a conversational interface that allows users to give unstructured commands using both text and speech-to-text input. After interpreting user intent, the AI pulls task details—such as description, deadline, priority, and reminders—and transforms them into structured JSON format so that they may be processed. Secure REST APIs created with FastAPI manage this data and enable effective CRUD operations. Accuracy and consistency are improved through the integration of LangChain with rapid engineering, context management, and structured data extraction. FastAPI is used in the backend for scalability and high speed, and MongoDB is used to safely store task and user data. Along with visualization options like calendar views and progress charts for efficient tracking, the system also provides automated email and browser notifications for timely reminders. In contrast to current systems, ProTask AI ensures modularity, maintainability, and adaptability with a tiered architecture that includes User Interface, Application, AI, Database, and Notification levels. The system offers a user-friendly, effective, and privacy-focused solution that streamlines job management and boosts overall productivity by fusing conversational AI, speech recognition, and intelligent automation. |
| AUTHOR | M.V. GAAYATHRI, DR. K. SANTHI SREE Post Graduate Student, Department of Computer Science Engineering, Data Science, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Hyderabad, India Professor and Head, Department of Computer Science Engineering, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Hyderabad, India |
| VOLUME | 185 |
| DOI | DOI: 10.15680/IJIRCCE.2026.1406035 |
| pdf/35_ProTask AI GenAI Integrated Task Manager.pdf | |
| KEYWORDS | |
| References | 1. T. B. Brown, B. Mann, N. Ryder, M. Subbiah, J. Kaplan, P. Dhariwal, A. Neelakantan, P. Shyam, G. Sastry, A. Askell, S. Agarwal, A. Herbert-Voss, G. Krueger, T. Henighan, R. Child, A. Ramesh, D. M. Ziegler, J. Wu, C. Winter, C. Hesse, M. Chen, E. Sigler, M. Litwin, S. Gray, B. Chess, J. Clark, C. Berner, S. McCandlish, A. Radford, I. Sutskever, and D. Amodei, "Language Models are Few-Shot Learners," in Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), vol. 33, pp. 1877–1901, 2020. 2. OpenAI, "GPT-4 Technical Report," arXiv:2303.08774, Mar. 2023. 3. R. Bommasani, D. A. Hudson, E. Adeli, R. Altman, S. Arora, S. von Arx, M. Bernstein, J. Bohg, A.Bosselut,E. Brunskill, et al., "On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models," arXiv:2108.07258, Aug. 2021. 4. P. Liang, R. Bommasani, T. Lee, D. Tsipras, D. Soylu, Y. Yao, S. Kumar, and P. Narayanan, "Holistic Evaluation of Language Models," arXiv:2211.09110, Nov. 2022. 5. T. Zhang, S. H. Tan, and M. Kim, "Machine Learning Testing: Survey, Landscapes and Horizons," ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1–36, Jan. 2020. 6. S. Yao, J. Zhao, D. Yu, N. Du, I. Shafran, K. Narasimhan, and Y. Cao, "ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models," in Proc. Int. Conf. Learning Representations (ICLR), 2023. 7. T. Schick, J. Dwivedi-Yu, R. Dessì, R. Raileanu, M. Lomeli, E. Hambro, L. Zettlemoyer, N. Cancedda, and T. Scialom, "Tool former: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools," in Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2023. 8. Y. Deng, L. Liao, W. Lei, G. H. Yang, W. Lam, and T.-S. Chua, "Proactive Conversational AI: A Comprehensive Survey of Advancements and Opportunities," ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 1–45, Oct. 2023. 9. Al-Maskari, E. Yilmaz, and M. Sanderson, "Conversational Search: A Review of Current Research and Future Directions," ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1–30, Aug. 2021. 10. Casanueva, P. Budzianowski, Y. Gkoumas, and M. Gašić, "Efficient Dialogue State Tracking by Selectively Overwriting Memory," ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1–27, Apr. 2023. 11. J. Wei, X. Wang, D. Schuurmans, M. Bosma, F. Xia, E. Chi, Q. Le, and D. Zhou, "Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models," in Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), vol. 35, pp. 24824–24837, 2022. 12. Y. Liu, A. Strobelt, and S. Zhang, "Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks," in Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2020. 13. L. Bubeck, V. Chandrasekaran, R. Eldan, J. Gehrke, E. Horvitz, E. Kamar, P. Lee, Y. Lee, Y. Li, S. Lundberg, et al., "Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early Experiments with GPT-4," arXiv:2303.12712, Mar. 2023. 14. Madaan, S. Tandon, P. Gupta, A. Hallinan, L. Gao, J. Wiegreffe, U. Alon, S. Dziri, A. Prabhumoye, Y. Yang, et al., "Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback," in Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2023. 15. H. W. Chung, L. Hou, S. Longpre, B. Zoph, Y. Tay, W. Fedus, E. Li, X. Wang, M. Dehghani, S. Brahma, et al., "Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Models," Journal of Machine Learning Research (JMLR), vol. 25, no. 70, pp. 1–53, 2024. 16. J. Wei, M. Bosma, V. Zhao, K. Guu, A. W. Yu, B. Lester, N. Du, A. M. Dai, and Q. V. Le, "Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learners," in Proc. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2022. 17. T. Kojima, S. S. Gu, M. Reid, Y. Matsuo, and Y. Iwasawa, "Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners," in Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), vol. 35, pp. 22199–22213, 2022. 18. S. Park, J. O’Brien, C. Cai, M. Morris, P. Liang, and M. Bernstein, "Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior," in Proc. ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST), pp. 1–22, 2023. 19. H. Touvron, L. Martin, K. Stone, P. Albert, A. Almahairi, Y. Babaei, N. Bashlykov, S. Batra, P. Bhargava, S. Bhosale, et al., "Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models," arXiv:2307.09288, Jul. 2023. 20. X. Wang, J. Wei, D. Schuurmans, Q. Le, E. Chi, S. Narang, A. Chowdhery, and D. Zhou, "Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models," in Proc. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2023. |
